.

Questions Remain After Playland News

The fanfare might have come too early, according to some Westchester County lawmakers.

Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino signed a letter of intent with non-profit organization Sustainable Playland this afternoon, but the marching band, balloon release and ceremony that ensued to celebrate the revitalization of Playland park may have been premature, according to some county Board of Legislators members.

Two Democratic legislators who attended the press conference say they just heard about the proposed management agreement the morning of the announcement and have some concerns about the its longterm viability.

“Today, the Board of Legislators, as well as residents, got a general overview of a plan for Playland,” said BOL Chairman Ken Jenkins, D-Yonkers. “What must follow is a delivery of the proposal and all of its details to the Board for our review.  It’s the Board of Legislators that will ultimately decide to approve any agreement after public discussion and public input.” 

Essentially, the “letter of intent,” agrees that the county will turn management of the 100-acre amusement park to Sustainable Playland Inc. With $34 million from investors, the group would pay the county $4 million up front, a base minimum of $1.2 million each year (beginning in 2014), and eventually more depending on profitability.

Sustainable Playland's payments will go toward the county’s $32 million debt on Playland. According to Astorino, the plan will save the county $18 million in interest and principal payments over the remaining 12-year life of the bonds.

 “I am concerned that the county still has liability for the debt,” Legislator Catherine Borgia said.

The $4 million is a one-time payment and there were no specifics provided on how much more than the minimum $1.2 million the county will get if Sustainable Playland is profitable, or what happens if it is not. The county pays $3.6 million in debt service each year, according to Astorino. So, after the first year, Borgia and Ryan ask, where will the rest of the money come from?

 “I love Playland. It is beautiful. I want to see it succeed,” said Borgia about her hopes that the county finds a viable plan. “And I am in favor of public-private partnerships,” she said of the SPI plan. But Borgia said she needs more information.

 “I am looking for detailed financials,” she said, adding that she also wants to see a marketing plan to consider the sustainability of Sustainable Playland’s program.

When the county decided to consider new ideas for Playland in 2010, a 19-member Citizens Advisory Committee was formed, which included three members of the Board of Legislators, Bill Ryan, Judy Myers and Republican Sheila Marcotte, and business, civic, church and student representatives. Sustainable Playland was among the Citizens Committee’s top ranked recommendations, along with Standard Amusements and Central Amusements International.

However, Ryan said that he has not been involved in the decision-making process since those were selected as the top choices last year.

 “The plan appears to address some of the major financial and operational issues that this county government has been wrestling with for more than a decade,” said Legislator Ryan. “But a decision of this magnitude regarding one of the County’s most important properties must be made jointly by the executive and Legislature.”

Astornio responded to the legislators’ concerns by saying that the county will have continuous oversight of the park.

“If the Board of Legislators wants to throw red tape at this, it only hastens the drain on the taxpayers,” Astorino said, emphasizing that bureaucracy should be “taken out of this,” and the county should “let the professionals handle it.”

“We are still trying to figure out what it all means,” said Board of Legislators press secretary Thomas Staudter. 



Bob Zahm October 11, 2012 at 11:01 PM
Here they go again - Boss Jenkins' crew versus the County Executive. One can only wonder if the back and forth will go long enough to kill the deal. Of course, ensuring that the financials are sound - and that all money coming out of the deal is used to pay for Playland debt before any pet projects - is the right way to go.
Billy L October 12, 2012 at 12:14 AM
Usually I am on board with Astorino but this is a disgrace. This plan calls for the removal of most of the rides of Playland and turning into something that it is not suppose to be. I support privatization but there were so many better ideas than this one, such as Central Amusements. What's really going on here is that they want their great lawn and sculpture gardens and want to make Playland have less attendance and less traffic in their pristine Rye. Absolutely DISGRACE. My Astorino, you have lost my vote in the future. I like a lot of what you have done for this county because like myself, you are a conservative. But I cannot support someone who supports fundamentally changing a venerable Westchester institution. I understand the need to stem the red ink, but this was the wrong way to do it.
Tommy Li October 12, 2012 at 01:13 AM
Well,it's very good.I quite agree with your point of view. http://www.saleukwatches.com
Rye Reader October 12, 2012 at 05:05 AM
This is a dreadful failure of stewardship. Playland is a treasure the county possesses and should cherish, preserve, and maintain. Sustainable Playland is a travesty. This is an outrage, a heartbreak.
joshua tanner October 12, 2012 at 05:53 AM
Four people got killed 4 years in a row at Playland. Ride operators were going to Burger king while kids were on the rides. The place is horribley managed by the county - who doesn't make competence a primary factor in hiring, managing etc. Playland is a treasure but its run like a dump - a dangerous one at that
Walden Macnair October 12, 2012 at 10:50 AM
There are certain things that private industry does better than government. In this large group of things are amusement parks, golf courses and a host of non-essential services. With our taxes through the roof the priorities of government should not be on losing money. I agree with Astorino; farm this out to a company that can turn a profit and make sure the county makes money with them. Once this is a success begin franchising out the golf courses (another losing proposition) Regardless of what golfers tell you, it is not essential to life and is just a hobby. The hard working tax payers of this county don't pay for my hobbies so I see no reason to subsidize theirs. This is a good start. Now let's see if they can make it happen.
Billy L October 12, 2012 at 02:02 PM
I also agree with this...that's why we wanted to Central Amusements to get the green light to invest in Playland, not this disaster of Susatainable Playland.
Billy L October 12, 2012 at 02:03 PM
It is not a good start. First of all, please understand the county loses money on Playland because they lump in all the interest on the debt in the bottom line. The operations of the park itself do not lose money. Seconly, there were three main proposals by private companies to run the park. You should read up and each one and you will see this one will destroy the park, not re-invigorate it.
Billy L October 12, 2012 at 02:04 PM
I support privatizing the park, but only if it's a company that will enhance it and restore it, not take the rides out. The other company, Central Amusements, would have done a great job privatizing the park.
a lee October 12, 2012 at 03:02 PM
Absolutely the best. Lots of applauds for a job well done. Upgrading the historic areas and adding more year round use makes sense.
Billy L October 12, 2012 at 03:13 PM
Taking the 'play' out of Playland by removing the rides is a disgrace and amounts to the destruction of the integrity of what makes it Playland.
Jennifer Amatulli October 12, 2012 at 04:31 PM
noticed Astorino never mentioned what will happen to the county employees that have been working there for many years. Many will suddenly be laid off, what about them?
Francis T McVetty October 13, 2012 at 08:25 PM
ArTDecoPlayLand, and what is your plan?
Francis T McVetty October 13, 2012 at 08:32 PM
If it is NOT county owned, how can the country employe them? When a business, such as Play-land changes ownership, then maybe the new owners may want to hire them. If not, that is the way life goes. If it is was a private business, wouldn't that be the same. The county is NOT in the amusement business, golf business and farm business!!! The economic times are extremely hard right now. We can't afford these amenities.
Billy L October 14, 2012 at 08:38 PM
Francis, from the beginning, meaning back in 2001 when this first came on to the spotlight, I supported increased county investment in newer rides and rebuilding the colonnades, back when a modest investment by the county would have paid dividends. In 2012 the park needs so much investment I did not think it was wise the county was do it. Me and my group, the Save Rye Playland group on Facebook endorsed the plan put forward by Central Amusements. They have done wonderful work rebuilding and remaking Coney Island. I read through all the proposals the county received in detail and felt that was the best one. They were going to add more water rides, new rides, preserve and restore the park's original design intent and see to boost attendance by making it bigger and better, not by shrinking it. As someone who spends a lot of time at Coney Island, I can attest that Central Amusements is a great company. I encourage you to read up on their proposal. I did not support, like some would think, for the county to continue with the blank checks for Playland. I do identify as a conservative Republican and I agree we cannot afford things like that right now, but as a resident of Westchester, and 5 generation now of people going to Playland the place is very close to my heart and I do not want to see it diminished in any way. I feel making it a smaller, more passive venue is the wrong way to go. Check out Save Rye Playland on Facebook!
Chief Siwanoy October 15, 2012 at 06:31 PM
"Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino signed a letter of intent with non-profit organization Sustainable Playland this afternoon, but the marching band, balloon release and ceremony that ensued to celebrate the revitalization of Playland park..." A balloon release?! On the Sound at Playland. Really? Whatever one thinks of the 'plan', celebrating with a balloon release is extremely unfortunate. Balloon releases are just an expensive way to pollute the marine environment and there are many good alternatives http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7447381.stm

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »