This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Politics & Government

Former State Sen. Leibell Sentenced to 21 Months on Corruption Charges

Obstruction of justice and tax charges netted the former state senator 21 months in prison

Former state Sen. Vincent L. Leibell III—guilty of corruption and facing jail time—said he’d rather do his time in war-torn Iraq than a federal prison. Today, a federal judge in White Plains sentenced him instead to 21 months in prison.

Under sentencing guidelines that were negotiated last December, Leibell faced imprisonment for up to two years after pleading guilty to felony charges of evading taxes and obstructing justice. He must still make restitution of up to $20,522 to the Internal Revenue Service.

Judge Warren Warren W. Eginton fined him $4,000 and ordered him to serve three years of supervised release.

Find out what's happening in Ryewith free, real-time updates from Patch.

The pleas came barely more than a month after the Patterson Republican’s election as Putnam county executive and abruptly ended a political career that included 28 years as a state legislator serving Putnam County and parts of Dutchess and Westchester.

It was as a state senator, prosecutors charged, that Leibell demanded kickbacks from two lawyers who represented his nonprofit senior housing organization and who also served as outside counsel to Putnam County.

Find out what's happening in Ryewith free, real-time updates from Patch.

One of those lawyers has been identified as Carl Lodes, who served as Putnam’s county attorney from 1991 until early 2008. Prosecutors say Leibell pressured both lawyers to kick back a portion of their legal fees, threatening to withhold payments for work performed or in Lodes’ case to cost him his job. Leibell, in court, admitted to receiving $43,000 in payments from the lawyers and failing to report that money as income.

In June 2010, FBI agents seized records held by the Putnam county attorney that related to the hiring of outside counsel. Aware that federal investigators were closing in, Leibell met on a Carmel street with Lodes, who had been subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury empaneled to probe corruption allegations. Unaware that the lawyer was recording their conversation, prosecutors would later charge, Leibell ordered Lodes to lie about cash he’d withdrawn from his personal bank account and kicked back to the lawmaker.

Also in June, the FBI subpoenaed documents in Carmel related to legal services provided by the now-defunct Westchester law firm Servino, Santangelo & Randazzo, which was briefly the Carmel town counsel and which took in almost $2 million in legal work from Putnam County between 2000 and 2004.

The second lawyer in the corruption case, who has not been named, was identified only as a partner in a Westchester firm that agreed in 2000 to pay "consulting fees" to Leibell.

The first lawyer, Lodes, and his recording provided direct evidence of corruption, prosecutors said. They quoted Leibell as instructing Lodes to mislead investigators by saying the money he’d withdrawn was meant to provide support for Lodes’ elderly mother and emergency funds in the event of a 9/11-style terrorist attack.

“As long as you and I are consistent, I'm fine, you're fine," Leibell is quoted as saying in the recording. "There was never any cash between you and I, okay?" The recorded conversation, prosecutors said, was the underpinning for their obstruction of justice charge, one of two to which Leibell pleaded guilty last Dec. 6.

Since then, the court was flooded in a flurry of paper, including more than 100 letters of support for Leibell, a defense motion arguing the upside of not confining the disgraced lawmaker and, in a bizarre twist, a request from Leibell to serve, in lieu of prison, in one of the world’s trouble spots, Libya and Iraq among them. “I have spoken with people in the court system and told them of my great willingness to serve during the current difficulties our nation is experiencing,” Leibell said in a letter to the judge.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?